Jump to content


- - - - -

Mothers claiming Pampers Dry Max technology diapers causing chemical burns


  • You cannot reply to this topic
4 replies to this topic

#1 *whiterabbit11*

  • Guests
  • Feedback: View

Posted 03 May 2010 - 12:52 PM

not meaning to start a bun fight re: using sposies :) just came across these articles which i thought might interest others on NA

http://www.kens5.com...s-92472284.html

http://allaboutcloth...-cloth-diapers/

#2 Crunchy_Nut

    Masters

  • Members
  • Feedback: View
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 13,747 posts

Posted 03 May 2010 - 01:09 PM

alex hasnt had a problem with pampers cruisers. we've used almost 3 packs and she's been fine.
i think every baby gets bum rash at some stage, but every parent wants someone/something to blame.

#3 janem

    High School

  • Members
  • Feedback: View
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 2,340 posts

Posted 03 May 2010 - 01:13 PM

I am not disputing the babies may have a rash from a reaction or allergy to the gel in the sposies but not technically a "chemical burn" . It is unfortunate that some mothers are calling it a chemical burn, as scientifically that isn't correct and therefore they are going to have the skeptics shoot them down. They should have just kept the wording to rash and blisters caused by a reaction to the gel.

#4 kyleekister

    Kindergarten

  • Members
  • Feedback: View
  • PipPip
  • 395 posts

Posted 03 May 2010 - 01:24 PM

i just checked the box that we have but we still have not used any yet i think they have to say dry max on them and my box has not got that written on them also on the clip they said they were only on sale for 4 weeks so i don't think they will be on sale in australia yet

#5 esoteriqua

    Pre-School

  • Members
  • Feedback: View
  • Pip
  • 54 posts

Posted 05 May 2010 - 06:47 PM

I put DS in Pampers overnight and on the box I bought there was a promo that had expired at the beginning of January. If all of the Australian stock is that old, I don't think we'll have a problem!





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users