Bambo Nature Nappy Sample ...?
#1
Posted 02 February 2008 - 07:49 PM
If anyone is interested...The link is right here.
They also have samples of their own "organic" body wash/shampoo etc range..
#2
Posted 02 February 2008 - 07:56 PM
#3
Posted 02 February 2008 - 08:00 PM
Quote
* the fluff pulp is made from wood from sustainable forestry;
* all raw materials are FDA approved;
* there are no optical brighteners;
* they are not chlorine bleached;
* there are no moisturisers, perfumes or lotions;
* there are maximum limits on energy consumption;
* there are maximum limits of emissions of CO2;
* there are limits on the quantity of waste produced during manufacture;
* the pigments in printing inks are not based on heavy metals;
* chemicals classified as harmful, irritant, allergenic, sensitizanic, carcinogenic, mutagenic, teratogenic, or environmentally harmful are not used in the raw materials in the end production of nappies; and
* even the packaging has to meet strict requirements - certain quantities of the synthetic polymer (i.e. plastic) must originate from renewable raw materials. Bambo Nature packaging is fully recycleable.
Quote
*
free of MBT (monobutyltin);
*
free of DBT (dibutyltin);
*
free of TBT (tributyltin);
*
free of HCHO (formaldehyde);
*
free of Cl (Chlorine);
*
free of Phthalates;
*
free of latex;
*
free of perfumes, moisturising, optical brighteners and PVC;
*
chemicals classified as harmful, irritant, allergenic, sensitizanic, carcinogenic, mutagenic, teratogenic, or environmentally harmful are not used in the raw materials in the end production of nappies; and
*
all raw materials are FDA approved
For more information on MBT, DBT and TBT found in disposable nappies, please click this link to see an article about Greenpeace's test results of nappies.
Quote
However, most disposable nappies end up in landfill. Landfill is anaerobic, meaning that there is no air, water and light essential to biodegradation. This means that anything thrown into landfill will biodegrade extremely slowly. Indeed, archaeologists in London found a banana skin in a rubbish dump dated to 1460!
This makes the environmental impact of the manufacturing process so important in considering the ?cradle to grave? eco footprint of the nappy you choose.
You can also reduce the eco footprint of your Bambo Nature disposable nappy even further, by composting. By composting your nappy and removing the non-biodegradable parts, you will reduce the volume of waste going into landfill. Please note that you should only compost wet nappies in a home compost.
Bambo Nature nappies are recyclable by a specialist nappy recycler, such as My Planet in Melbourne (who services are, unfortunately, currently suspended) or at specialist plants such as the Global Renewables recycling plant in Eastern Creek, NSW, where the innovative UR-3R Process (Urban Resource ? Reduction, Recovery and Recycling) is used.
#4 *Phoenixs Mum*
Posted 02 February 2008 - 08:05 PM
And all disposables are 66-70% biodegradable, eventually :crazy:
And all disposables can be recycled at those nappy recycling plants....
#5 *Phoenixs Mum*
Posted 02 February 2008 - 08:06 PM
#6
Posted 02 February 2008 - 08:06 PM
#7 *zilzie*
Posted 03 February 2008 - 08:56 AM
I am with Amber though the more I look into stuff the more pissed off I get.
#8
Posted 03 February 2008 - 11:09 AM
Quote
But this thread wasn't about that ;) It's just for people who DO use sposies and might want to try something with an ECO label on it.. for a "free" sample.. :tongue3:
#9 *Phoenixs Mum*
Posted 03 February 2008 - 11:31 AM
The point I was making is that they make false claims so people spend more on their nappies because they think they are a better choice environmentally, when in fact they are all the same composition as Huggies or Babylove.
If you use disposables, why pay so much more for an 'Eco' disposable if they aren't better environmentally?
#10
Posted 03 February 2008 - 11:51 AM
#11
Posted 03 February 2008 - 11:57 AM
#12 *Phoenixs Mum*
Posted 03 February 2008 - 12:19 PM
If people want to pay $2 for a nappy (which is overpriced) and makes false claims feel free.
My apologies for trying to inform people that they aren't 'Eco' at all.
I actually got a sample and tried it back when we used 'Eco' sposies. (Before I researched the whole thing and found out the hard evidence). They are crap. I didn't have to pay $2 for my sample though.
I wasn't being anti-sposie. I was actually trying to inform people that false claims about eco disposables is wrong; we paid so much more for 'Eco' disposables before we converted and I was so angry when I discovered I was being conned into buying something that wasn't any better environmentally than Huggies/Snugglers/Homebrand. I could have saved my money.
A lot of people might like to be informed about this.
#13
Posted 03 February 2008 - 12:23 PM
If you were looking to inform someone, it might have been a better option to start a thread with all the facts - that still is a great idea actually, and since you seem to know the most about them maybe we can elect you to bundle the research?
#14 *Phoenixs Mum*
Posted 03 February 2008 - 12:29 PM
It outlines the plastic content in disposables so people are informed that Eco disposables are not in fact eco.
http://nappyaddicts....ic,1349.15.html
No need to get so defensive about your thread.
#15
Posted 03 February 2008 - 12:35 PM
Quote
It outlines the plastic content in disposables so people are informed that Eco disposables are not in fact eco.
http://nappyaddicts....ic,1349.15.html
No need to get so defensive about your thread.
I'm not getting defensive, I'm just saying it was plain and simple - if someone wants a "free" sample, here it is. No need to get into the politics of whats in them etc..
#16 *Shopaholic*
Posted 12 February 2008 - 08:01 PM
Thanks Jenn, i dont really use them often but thanks for letting people who ARE interested in the freebies know about the offer!
#17 *my_fallen_angel*
Posted 12 February 2008 - 08:32 PM
i didnt have to pay postage though
i wouldnt have got it if i did
mind you the sample is somewhere in his room
i never used it probably to small now anyway
#18 *Mumtothree*
Posted 12 February 2008 - 08:37 PM
What about the chemical make up though, that bit has always worried me more than the environmental impact even, is the bad chemicals against bubs skin. It looks like they think that they offer a better option for that.
Thanks for letting us know Jenn! I still use sposies for the occaisonal camping trip or when it's rained for days, might look into it actually. My baby rashes up bad under the huggies, but I use them so little it hasn't been an issue. Wonder if the same would happen with these if they are better chemically.
#19 *my_fallen_angel*
Posted 12 February 2008 - 08:43 PM
#20 *Phoenixs Mum*
Posted 12 February 2008 - 08:43 PM
You can get 5 Moltex nappies for $5 as a trial... But they are very expensive to buy unless you only used them occasionally. And they are only 30% plastic. Also they have less crap in them; but they still aren't environmentally friendly.... And some of the company's ideas aren't all that ethical, but at least they are better than others.
People need to know the truth about products, I think it is wrong to mislead people. I'd rather know the truth if I was giving a company my money- even if it is only $2.
#21
Posted 12 February 2008 - 08:51 PM
Quote
It says you can get 3 nappies any sizes.
Though they might have more plastic, don't they have less chemicals?
Anyway I don't want to argue.
#22 *Shopaholic*
Posted 12 February 2008 - 09:15 PM
Look at all the crap over a friggin free nappy!
#23 *Phoenixs Mum*
Posted 12 February 2008 - 09:20 PM
#24
Posted 13 February 2008 - 02:28 AM
i hadn't heard of this brand, and thought it might be different slightly in shape etc for some people :)
#25 *Shopaholic*
Posted 13 February 2008 - 09:06 AM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users














